The Drama Review (March 30, 2018)

Dear reminiscing drama readers,

Have you ever been asked, “Do you realize it’s been X years since such-and-such happened?” Like you, I usually have two reactions: 1) Sadness that I’m now that old and 2) Shock that time has passed so quickly.

Those were my exact reactions when I realized recently that 50 years has passed since Martin Luther King, Jr. was gunned down by an assassin in Memphis, Tennessee—April 4, 1968. I’ve been busier than usual of late and not many things have gotten me into a pensive mood, but this has.

I’d like to talk about Dr. King, but first I need to review some things I’ve previously said about drama—the subject of this weekly letter. So, indulge me a few paragraphs of drama-recapping and then I’ll bring us around to how I see Martin Luther King relating to this subject matter.

How Dramas Work

Lacking what’s needed to handle people problems in a reasonable manner, drama people resort to their only relational alternative—drama. Drama operates through the following unspoken imperative: My role in the drama is this; your role in the drama is that. As long as we both stay inside of our drama roles, we’ll get along just fine. Any questions?” Consequently, relational “success” is contingent upon drama participation. That’s just how it works.

But drama participation has deleterious effects on those required to participate. You’ve heard me say it before: drama participation makes you sick, drives you crazy, and wears you out.

So, let’s say a person—rightfully-so and healthily-so—decides to stop performing his or her obligatory drama role. What does that do to the drama person? Here’s where I talk about three drama-person-levels.

A “Level 1” drama person initially gets frustrated with your drama non-participation and tries to force you back into your role. But if he’s repeatedly unable to coerce your re-participation, his frustration may eventually lead to healthier ways of relating. He starts exercising his previously atrophied reason muscles. It’s like the drama non-participation shocks those muscles out of dormancy into growth and he starts changing in a positive direction. In other words, he grows.

A “Level 2” drama person does two things in response to drama non-participation. First, he redoubles his efforts to coerce re-participation. Second, he cuts you off and stops having anything to do with you—because he can’t stand the frustration. At this point, he may take his drama show to someone else who’s a more willing participant. He doesn’t change but his relationship with you does. It may cease to exist or become more limited. In other words, he stays stuck.

A “Level 3” drama person responds to drama non-participation by becoming unsafe. He may try to hurt you, kill you, or destroy your life in some way. He may try to besmirch your reputation or deprive you of income-making potential. In other words, he becomes dangerous.

I’m getting to MLK but let me also say a few more things.

Jim Crow Mississippi

I was born and raised in the Jim Crow south—Mississippi to be specific. I have vivid memories of separate drinking fountains, blacks being relegated to the backs of busses, city pools closing rather than complying with court-ordered integration, black servants entering through back doors and never through front doors. I’ll never forget the night our dishes rattled when the house of an integration-friendly neighbor got bombed down the street. “Mississippi was a great place to grow up,” I’ve told people often, “if you were white.”

We, in our family, didn’t consider ourselves to be vicious, hateful racists. We were just nicer about it. We were careful not to say disparaging things about black people when they were close enough to hear us. And instead of the ugly-sounding N-word, we preferred the more genteel-sounding “nigra” or “colored.” But like a man who hasn’t bathed for a month trying to cover his B.O. with English Leather, the stench of racism was there nonetheless.

In significant ways, Jim Crow Mississippi was a collective drama that worked like this: “Our role (white people) is to be in charge. Your role (black people) is to do what we say and be who we need. As long as we all stay in our roles, we’ll ‘get along’ fine. Any questions?” It was considered a tribute if you said about a black man, “He knows his place and stay in it.”

Whites looked on that arrangement with fondness because life ran so smoothly for us. But for blacks—those forced into their roles of submission—not so much. The drama did to them what all dramas do: it made them sick, drove them crazy, and wore them out.

Martin Luther King

It had all gone on for way too long when Martin Luther King entered the drama from stage right. He was a drama buster if there ever was one. To use my verbiage, he said to the blacks of his day, “The time has come for us to step outside of our drama roles of obligatory submission. Change will never come until we do.” They did. And things changed.

Many southern racists turned out to be Level 1’s. That is, they responded by waking up and seeing their racism (the openly nasty type or the less obvious genteel type) for what it actually was and abandoning it. I count myself in this group. Much about the South has changed but that change would have never occurred without the collective drama non-participation of blacks under the leadership of Dr. King and many courageous others.

Some turned out to be Level 2’s, maintaining and rationalizing their racism while becoming more discrete about it. Their racism didn’t change; they just moved it off center stage. But from time to time when the conditions are favorable, the curtain gets pulled back and there it is in all its ugliness (think Charlottesville). These people engage in the collective pretense that life was actually better under the old we’re-up-and-they’re-down arrangement. They may not be rushing off to late night meetings with eyeholes cut in their sheets, but they’re congregating virtually in social media klaverns.

And some turned out to be dangerous Level 3’s. One of those, James Earl Ray, took the life of Dr. King on April 4, 1968.

So, I’ve been thinking about what happened a half century ago. I’d like to thank Martin Luther King for his courage, for his ability to move an entire culture with the strength of truth, and for freeing us—some from Jim Crow and others of us from evil ideas.

I’d like to thank him for his willingness to step out of the drama and persuade others to follow him.

7 replies

    Thank u for taking the “drama” perspective to the national arena. Your words have been helpful to me and my clients (I am a psychotherapist) in the personal arena, and I’m glad to see it portrayed at a national level!
    Thank u for your wisdom and your willingness to continue to share after your workshops, which I was blessed to attend!! U are a Godsend!

  2. Adele
    Adele says:

    He was a courageous man and a role model for many of us at that time, yet I had never thought of him as a “drama buster”. Thank you for pointing that out.

  3. Pam Smith
    Pam Smith says:

    Thank you, Dr. Godwin, for your Drama Review. It really underscores my personal experience with drama people. Disengaging with them is always necessary, as the false circle of their imaginary story needs to be broken before any change is possible.
    I do wonder what your thoughts are on we as a nation can do with a drama person as a president? Disengaging appears to be an easier (though not easy) process on the individual level than on a level as complex and influential as a president.
    Again, thank you for your important insights.

    • Alan Godwin
      Alan Godwin says:

      I agree. It’s hard enough–complex enough–to handle them on an individual level. It’s much more vexing when the person holds a leadership position of any sort. I wish I had a quick answer to your very good question but I don’t.

Comments are closed.